CHAPTER 05 · MA-0350

EN — English ES — Español

Convergence Tests for Series

What follows presents several convergence tests for numerical series. See also: Important topics and examples, Series of functions. Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=0}^\infty\) be a sequence. Consider

\[S_{n} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} x_{k} = x_{1} + x_{2} +\dots+x_{n}\]

We say that \(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x_{k}\) converges if \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } S_{n}\) exists

Cauchy condition

The series \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n}\) converges if and only if for every \(\varepsilon > 0\) there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that

\[\lvert S_{n} - S_{m} \rvert < \varepsilon \quad \text{for all \quad$n,m \geq N$}\] \[\iff \lvert x_{n+1} + x_{n+2} + \dots + x_{m} \rvert < \varepsilon \quad \text{if \quad$m > n$}\]

The series converges if and only if it is Cauchy.

Example

Consider \(x_{n} = \frac{1}{n}, n\geq 1\). We will prove that \(S_{2n} - S_{n} \geq \frac{1}{2}\). Note that

\[\begin{aligned} S_{2n} - S_{n} &= \left( 1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\dots+\frac{1}{2n} \right) -\left( 1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\dots+\frac{1}{n} \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{n+1} + \frac{1}{n+2} +\dots +\frac{1}{2n-1} + \frac{1}{2n} \\ &\geq \frac{1}{2n} + \frac{1}{2n} + \dots +\frac{1}{2n} + \frac{1}{2n} = \frac{n}{2n} = \frac{1}{2}. \end{aligned}\]

Hence the Cauchy condition fails for \(\varepsilon < \frac{1}{2}\).

Consider the case \(x_{n} \geq 0\). Then

\[S_{n+1} = S_{n} + x_{n+1}\geq S_{n}\] \[\implies S_{n+1} - S_{n} = x_{n+1}.\]

Lemma (Boundedness of partial sums):

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be such that \(x_{n} \geq 0\) . Then

  1. \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x_{n}\) converges if there exists \(M\) such that \(\lvert S_{n} \rvert \leq M\) for every \(n\).
  2. Otherwise the \(S_{n}\) are unbounded, i.e., \(\lim_{ n \to \infty }S_{n} = \infty\).

The p-series test

Example

Consider

\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n} = +\infty\]

Proof: If \(x_{n} \geq 0\), then the \(S_{n}\) are increasing. Hence \(S_{n}\) converges if and only if it is bounded. Take \(M > 0\); there exists \(N\) such that \(S_{N} > M\). Then, for \(n\geq N\),

\[S_{n} \geq S_{N} > M.\]

Example

Consider \(x_{n} = \frac{1}{n^2}\), that is,

\[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2}.\]

We know that \(\lim_{ n \to \infty }S_{n} = \infty\) or \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } S_{n} = l \in \mathbb{R}\). Note that:

\[\begin{aligned} S_{1} =& 1 \\ S_{2} =& 1 + \frac{1}{2^2} \\ S_{3} =& 1 + \frac{1}{2^2} + \frac{1}{3^2} \leq 1 + \frac{1}{2^2} + \frac{1}{2^2} = 1+\frac{1}{2} \\ S_{7} =& 1 + \frac{1}{2^2} + \frac{1}{3^2} + \dots + \frac{1}{7^2} \leq 1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4^{2}} + \frac{1}{4^{2}} + \frac{1}{4^{2}} + \frac{1}{4^{2}} \\ =&1 + \frac{1}{2} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^2. \end{aligned}\]

Consider

\[S_{2^j -1} = S_{n_{j}}.\]

We will prove that \(S_{n_{j}} \leq \sum_{n=0}^{j-1} \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^n \quad \text{(*)}\). We have already done the base case. For the inductive step, suppose that \(\text{(*)}\) holds. We must show that

\[S_{n_{j+1}} \leq \sum_{n=0}^{j+1} \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^n.\]

Note that

\[\begin{aligned} S_{n_{j+1}} &= S_{n_{j}} + x_{2^j} + x_{2^{j}+1} + \dots + x_{2^{j+1}-1} \\ &\leq \sum_{n=0}^{j} \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^n + \frac{2^j}{(2^j)^{2}} = \sum_{n=0}^{j-1} \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^n + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^j = \sum_{n=1}^{j} \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^n \end{aligned}\]

Since

\[\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^n = \frac{1}{1-\frac{1}{2}}.\]

it is bounded, so \(S_{2^{j+1} - 1} \leq M\), and therefore it converges.

We know that

\[\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n} = +\infty\] \[\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^{2}} \quad \text{converges}.\]

Let \(0<p<1\). Then

\[n > n^p \implies \frac{1}{n^p} > \frac{1}{n} \implies \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k^p} > \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k} \rightarrow \infty\]

Therefore it diverges to infinity. If \(p>2\), then

\[\frac{1}{n^2} > \frac{1}{n^p},\]

so \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n ^p}\) converges.

In general, if \(p > 1\), the series \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^p}\) converges.

Exercise:

Let \(x_{n} = \frac{1}{n^{p}}\), with \(p > 1\). Show that

\[S_{2^j - 1} \leq \sum_{i=0}^{j-1} \frac{1}{2^{j-1}}\]

Theorem (Comparison)

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=0}^\infty\) and \(\{z_{n}\}_{n=0}^\infty\) be such that \(0\leq x_{n}\leq z_{n}\) for every \(n\geq 1\). Then

  • If \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty z_{n}\) converges, then \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n}\) converges.
  • If \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n}\) diverges, then \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty z_{n}\) diverges.

Example

Consider

\[x_{n} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{ n^{3}+1 }} \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{ n^{3} }} = \frac{1}{n^\frac{3}{2}}\]

Therefore \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty x_{n}\) converges.

Lemma (Limit comparison)

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) and \(\{z_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be sequences such that \(x_{n} \geq 0\) and \(z_{n} \geq 0\) for \(n\geq1\).

  1. If \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{x_{n}}{z_{n}} = l \neq 0\), then either both converge or both diverge to infinity.
  2. If \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{x_{n}}{z_{n}} = 0\),
    • then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty x_{n}= +\infty\) implies \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty z_{n}= +\infty\).
    • then, if \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty z_{n}\) converges then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty x_{n}\) converges
  3. If \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{x_{n}}{z_{n}} = \infty\),
    • then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty z_{n}= +\infty\) implies \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty x_{n}= +\infty\).
    • then, if \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty x_{n}\) converges then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty z_{n}\) converges

Proof of (a): Assume that

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{x_{n}}{z_{n}} = l > 0.\]

Given \(\varepsilon > 0\), there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for every \(n \geq N\)

\[l - \varepsilon < \frac{x_{n}}{z_{n}} < l + \varepsilon \implies (l-\varepsilon) z_{n} < x_{n} < (l+\varepsilon) z_{n}.\]

Taking \(\varepsilon\) such that \(0<\varepsilon< \frac{l}{2}\), we get \(0 \leq (l-\varepsilon) z_{n} < x_{n}\). Note that

\[0 \leq (l - \varepsilon) \sum_{k=1}^\infty z_{k} \leq \sum_{k=1}^\infty x_{k} \leq (l+\varepsilon) \sum_{n=0}^\infty z_{n}\]

If \(\sum_{k=0}^\infty x_{k}\) converges, then by comparison \(\sum_{k=0}^\infty z_{k}\)

Example

\(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n^{5}-n^{3}+1}\) behaves like \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^{5}}\) since

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{\left( \frac{1}{n^{5}-n^{3}+1} \right)}{\left( \frac{1}{n^{5}} \right)} = \lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{n^{5}}{n^{5}-n^{3}+1} = 1\]

Example

\(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{2^{3n}+n^{5}}{10^{n}}\) behaves like \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \left( \frac{8}{10} \right)^{n}\) since

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{\frac{2^{3n}+n^{5}}{10^{n}}}{\left( \frac{8}{10} \right)^{n}} = 1\]

Lemma (Root test)

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be a sequence. Consider

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \sqrt[n]{ \lvert x_{n} \rvert }.\]
  • If \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } \sqrt[n]{ \lvert x_{n} \rvert } = l < 1\), then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert\) converges.

Proof: Let \(\varepsilon > 0\) be such that \(0 < l+\varepsilon < 1\). Then there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for every \(n \geq \mathbb{N}\)

\[l-\varepsilon < \sqrt[n]{ \lvert x_{n} \rvert } < l + \varepsilon \implies \lvert x_{n} \rvert <(l+\varepsilon)^n\]

for \(n \geq N\). Hence the series converges by comparison.

  • If \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } \sqrt[n]{ \lvert x_{n} \rvert } = l > 1\), then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert +\infty.\)

Example

For \(a>0\) let \(x_{n}=\frac{a^{n}}{n^{n}}\), with \(n\geq{1}\). Then

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \sqrt[n]{\frac{a^{n}}{n^{n}}} = \frac{a}{n} = 0.\]

Therefore \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{a^{n}}{n^{n}}\) converges.

Lemma (Ratio test)

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be a sequence. Consider

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{\lvert x_{n+1} \rvert}{\lvert x_{n} \rvert}\]

If \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{\lvert x_{n+1} \rvert}{\lvert x_{n} \rvert} = l < 1\), then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert\) converges.

If \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{\lvert x_{n+1} \rvert}{\lvert x_{n} \rvert} = l >1\), then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert = +\infty\) .

Proof: Let \(\varepsilon > 0\) be such that \(l-\varepsilon > 1\). Then there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for every \(n \geq \mathbb{N}\)

\[l-\varepsilon < \frac{\lvert x_{n+1} \rvert}{\lvert x_{n} \rvert} \implies (l-\varepsilon) \lvert x_{n} \rvert < \lvert x_{n+1} \rvert\]

Then, iterating,

\[\lvert x_{N+k} \rvert \geq (l-\varepsilon)^k \lvert x_{N} \rvert\]

Since \((l-\varepsilon) > 1\), \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty(l-\varepsilon)^k = +\infty\). Hence by comparison, \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert = +\infty\).

Example

Consider \(x_{n} = \frac{a^n}{n!}\) with \(a>0\). Note that

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \left\lvert \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}} \right\rvert = \lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{a}{n+1} = 0.\]

Hence \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty x_{n}\) converges.

Theorem (Absolute convergence):

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be a sequence. If \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert\) converges, then \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n}\) converges.

Proof: Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be a sequence. Then

\[\lvert x_{n} \rvert - x_{n} \leq 2 \lvert x_{n} \rvert\]

for every \(n \geq 1\). Assume that \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert\) converges to L. Then

\[\sum_{n=0}^\infty 2 \lvert x_{n} \rvert = 2L.\]

We conclude then that \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert - x_{n}\) converges. Let

\[S_{n} = \sum_{k=0}^n \lvert x_{k} \rvert - x_{k},\] \[\hat{S}_{n} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \lvert x_{k} \rvert\]

Then \(\hat{S}_{n} - S_{n} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} x_{k}\). Therefore \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty x_{n}\) converges.

Theorem (Convergence of a product of series)

Consider two sequences \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=0}^\infty\) and \(\{y_{n}\}_{n=0}^\infty\). If

  1. \(\lvert y_{k} \rvert \leq M\) for \(k \geq 1\).
  2. \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lvert x_{k} \rvert\) converges, then \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lvert x_{k} y _{k} \rvert\) converges.

Proof: Consider two sequences \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) and \(\{y_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\). We want to study the convergence of \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n} y_{n}\). Assume that \(\lvert y_{k} \rvert \leq M\) for \(k \geq 1\) and that \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lvert x_{k} \rvert\) converges. Note that

\[\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lvert x_{k}y_{k} \rvert \leq \sum_{k=1}^\infty M \lvert x_{k} \rvert = M \sum_{k=1}^\infty \lvert x_{k} \rvert\]

Conclude that \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty \lvert x_{k}y_{k} \rvert\) converges, and hence \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty x_{k} y_{k}\) converges.

Example

\(x_{k} = \frac{\sin k}{k^2}\). Note that \(\lvert \sin k \rvert \leq 1\) and \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k^{2}}\) converges

A more general trick: Consider \(\sum_{k=1}^{n} x_{k} y_{k}\). Take \(S_{k} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} y_{n}\). Then \(y_{k} = S_{k} - S_{k-1}\). Expanding:

\[\sum_{k=1}^{n} x_{k} y_{k} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} x_{k} (S_{k} - S_{k-1}) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} x_{k} S_{k} - \sum_{k=0}^{n} x_{k+1} S_{k} = \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} S_{k}(x_{k} - x_{k+1}) + x_{n} S_{n} - x_{1}S_{0}.\]

In fact, for \(m \leq n\), we have that

\[\sum_{k=m}^{n} x_{k}y_{k} = \sum_{k=m}^{n} (x_{k}-x_{k+1}) S_{k} + x_{n}S_{n} - x_{m}S_{m-1}.\]

Theorem (Dirichlet’s test)

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) and \(\{y_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be such that

  1. \(x_{n} \geq x_{n+1}\) for every \(n \in \mathbb{N}\),
  2. \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } x_{n} = 0\),
  3. there exists \(M \in \mathbb{R}\) such that for every \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), \(\lvert \sum_{k=1}^n y_{k} \rvert \leq M\) for every \(n \in \mathbb{N}\). Then \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n}y_{n}\) converges.

Proof: Let \(k \leq l\), then

\[\begin{aligned} \left\lvert \sum_{n=k}^{l} x_{n}y_{n} \right\rvert &\leq \sum_{n=k}^{l-1} \lvert x_{n}-x_{n+1} \rvert \lvert S_{n} \rvert +\lvert x_{l} \rvert \lvert S_{l} \rvert + \lvert x_{k} \rvert \lvert S_{k-1} \rvert \\ &\leq \sum_{n=k}^{l-1} (x_{n}-x_{n+1}) M + \lvert x_{l} \rvert M + \lvert x_{k} \rvert M \\ &=M(x_{k}-x_{l}) + Mx_{l} + Mx_{k} = 2Mx_{k} \end{aligned}\]

since \(x_{n}\geq_{0}\). Moreover, since \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } x_{n} = 0\), there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(\lvert x_{k} \rvert < \frac{\varepsilon}{2M}\) if \(k \geq N\), for a fixed and arbitrary \(\varepsilon > 0\). Hence, if \(l \geq l \geq N\), we have that

\[\left\lvert \sum_{n=k}^{l} x_{n} y_{n} \right\rvert < \varepsilon.\]

Therefore the series is Cauchy and converges.

Example

Consider \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n}}{n}\). Take \(x_{n} = \frac{1}{n}\), \(y_{n} = (-1)^{n}\). Then

\[S_{n} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} y_{k},\quad \text{In particular, }S_{1} =-1, S_{2} = 0 , S_{3} = -1,\dots\]

Hence \(S_{n}\) is bounded. Therefore \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n}}{n}\) converges.

Lemma (Alternating series convergence)

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be such that \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } x_{n} = 0\) and \(x_{n+1} \leq x_{n}\) for every \(n\geq1\). Then \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n} x_{n}\) converges.

Example

\(x_{n} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{ n }}\), \(x_{n}=\frac{1}{\ln(n+1)}\).

Consider \(y_{n} = \cos(nx)\), with \(x \in [0,2\pi)\). We want to bound \(\sum_{k=1}^\infty \cos(nx)\) for \(x \neq 0\) and \(x \neq \pi\). Note that

\[\begin{aligned} \sin\left( \left( k-\frac{1}{2} \right)x \right) - \sin\left( \left( k+\frac{1}{2} \right)x \right) &= 2 \cos(kx) \sin\left( \frac{x}{2} \right) \\ \iff \cos(kx) &= \frac{1}{2\sin\left( \frac{x}{2} \right)}\left[ \sin\left( \left( k+\frac{1}{2} x \right) \right) - \sin\left( \left( k-\frac{1}{2} \right) x \right) \right] \end{aligned}\]

Then,

\[\begin{aligned} \left\lvert \sum_{k=1}^{n} \cos(kx) \right\rvert &= \frac{1}{\left\lvert 2 \sin\left( \frac{x}{2} \right) \right\rvert } \left\lvert \sum_{k=1}^{n} \left[ \sin\left( \left( k+\frac{1}{2} \right) x \right) - \sin\left( \left( k-\frac{1}{2} \right) x \right)\right] \right\rvert \\ &=\frac{1}{\left\lvert 2 \sin\left( \frac{x}{2} \right) \right\rvert } \underbrace{ \left\lvert \sin\left( \left( n+\frac{1}{2} \right)x \right) -\sin\left( \frac{1}{2} x \right) \right\rvert }_{ \leq 2 \text{ since }-1 \leq \sin(x) \leq 1 } \\ &\leq \frac{1}{\lvert \sin\left( \frac{x}{2} \right) \rvert }. \end{aligned}\]

Theorem (Abel’s test)

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) and \(\{y_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be sequences such that

  1. \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) is monotone and convergent.
  2. \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty y_{n}\) converges. Then \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n} y_{n}\) converges.

Proof: Consider the following cases:

Case 1: The \(x_{n}\) are decreasing. Let \(L = \lim_{ n \to \infty } x_{n}\). Define \(z_{n} = x_{n} - L\). Then \(z_{n}\) is decreasing and \(\lim_{ n \to \infty }z_{n} = 0\). Therefore \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty y_{n} z_{n}\) converges. Note that

\[\sum_{n=1}^{m} y_{n} z_{n} + \underbrace{ \sum_{n=1}^{m} y_{n} L }_{\text{convergent} } = \sum_{n=1}^{m} y_{n} x_{n}.\]

Conclude that \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n} y_{n}\) converges.

Case 2: The \(x_{n}\) are increasing. Let \(L = \lim_{ n \to \infty } x_{n}\). Define \(z_{n} = L -x_{n}\). Then \(z_{n}\) is decreasing and \(\lim_{ n \to \infty }z_{n} = 0\). Therefore \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty y_{n} z_{n}\) converges. Note that

\[- \sum_{n=1}^{m} y_{n} z_{n} + \underbrace{ \sum_{n=1}^{m} y_{n} L }_{\text{convergent} } = \sum_{n=1}^{m} y_{n} x_{n}.\]

Conclude that \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty x_{n} y_{n}\) converges.

Example

\[\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n^{2}} \ln\left( 1-\frac{1}{n} \right)\]

Take \(y_{n} = \frac{1}{n^{2}}\) and \(x_{n} = \ln\left( 1-\frac{1}{n} \right)\). We know that \(\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n^{2}}\) converges. Moreover

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } x_{n} = \ln(1) = 0.\]

Since \(1-\frac{1}{n}\) is increasing, \(x_{n}\) is increasing. Conclude by Abel’s test that the series converges.

Example

Consider \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^{n} \frac{\ln(n)}{n}\). Note that \(\left( \frac{\ln(n)}{n} \right)' =\frac{1-\ln(x)}{x^{2}} \leq 0\) if \(x \geq e\). Then \(\frac{\ln(n)}{n}\) is decreasing for \(n \geq 3\) (we only need it to be eventually decreasing). Therefore \(\sum_{n=2}^\infty (-1)^{n} \frac{\ln(n)}{n}\) converges.

Theorem (Raabe’s test)

Let \(\{x_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be a sequence such that \(x_{n}\neq_{0}\) for every \(n \in \mathbb{N}\). Consider

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } n\left( 1 - \frac{\lvert x_{n+1}\rvert}{\lvert x_{n} \rvert } \right) = L.\]

Then

  1. \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \lvert x_{n} \rvert\) converges if \(L >1\).
  2. \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert\) diverges if \(L < 1\).

Proof: Given \(\varepsilon > 0\), there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that

\[L - \varepsilon \leq n\left( 1 - \left\lvert \frac{x_{n+1}}{x_{n}} \right\rvert \right) \leq L +\varepsilon\]

for \(n \geq N\). Assume \(L > 1\). Take \(\varepsilon>0\) such that \(L -\varepsilon > 1\). Now

\[\begin{aligned} \frac{L-\varepsilon}{n} &\leq 1 - \left\lvert \frac{x_{n+1}}{x_{n}} \right\rvert \\ \iff \left\lvert \frac{x_{n+1}}{x_{n}} \right\rvert &\leq 1 - \frac{l-\varepsilon}{n} \\ \iff n \left\lvert \frac{x_{n+1}}{x_{n}} \right\rvert &\leq n - (l -\varepsilon) \\ \iff n \lvert x_{n+1} \rvert &\leq n \lvert x_{n} \rvert -(l-\varepsilon) \lvert x_{n} \rvert \\ \iff n \lvert x_{n+1} \rvert &\leq (n-1) \lvert x_{n} \rvert -(L - \varepsilon - 1) \lvert x_{n} \rvert \end{aligned}\]

Then, for \(n\geq2\),

\[0 \leq (l-\varepsilon - 1) \lvert x_{n} \rvert \leq (n-1) \lvert x_{n} \rvert - n \lvert x_{n+1} \rvert.\]

Hence, if \(S =\sum_{n=1}^\infty (n-1) \lvert x_{n} \rvert - n \lvert x_{n+1} \rvert\) converges then \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty\lvert x_{n} \rvert\) converges. Now, \(\sum_{n=1}^{k} (n-1) \lvert x_{k} \rvert - n \lvert x_{n+1} \rvert = -k \lvert x_{k+1} \rvert\). Then S converges if \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } k \lvert x_{k+1} \rvert\) exists. But \((n-1) \lvert x_{n} \rvert - n \lvert x_{n+1} \rvert\), i.e., the sequence is decreasing and bounded below (since it is positive). Therefore, conclude that \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \lvert x_{n} \rvert\) converges.

Example

Consider \(x_{n} = \frac{1\cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot \dots (2n+1)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6 \cdot... \cdot (2n+2)}\). Note that

\[\frac{x_{n+1}}{x_{n}} = \frac{\frac{1\cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot \dots (2n+3)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6 \cdot... \cdot (2n+2)}}{ \frac{1\cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot \dots (2n+4)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6 \cdot... \cdot (2n+2)}} = \frac{2n+3}{2n+4} \underset{n\rightarrow \infty}{\longrightarrow} 1.\]

Applying Raabe’s test:

\[n\left( 1-\frac{x_{n+1}}{x_{n}} \right) = n\left( 1 - \frac{2n+3}{2n+4} \right) = n\left( \frac{1}{2n+4} \right) \underset{n \rightarrow \infty}{\longrightarrow} \frac{1}{2}.\]

Therefore it diverges.

Theorem (Cauchy condensation)

Let \(\{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be decreasing and positive. Then \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_{n}\) converges if and only if \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty 2^{n} a_{2^{n}}\) converges

Proof: Let \(\{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be a decreasing, positive sequence. Note that

\[\begin{aligned} 2a_{2} &\leq a_{1}+a_{2} &&\leq 2a_{1} \\ 2a_{4} &\leq a_{3}+a_{4} &&\leq 2a_{3} \\ 2^{2} a_{8} &\leq a_{5}+a_{6}+a_{7}+a_{8} &&\leq 2^{2} a_{5} \\ 2^{3} a_{16} &\leq a_{9} + a_{10} + \dots + a_{16} &&\leq 2^{3}a_{9} \\ & \vdots && \\\ 2^{n-1} a_{2^{n}} &\leq a_{2^{n-1}+1} + \dots + a_{2^{n}} &&\leq 2^{n-1} a_{2^{n-1}+1}. \end{aligned}\]

We want \(S_{n} = \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{k}\) to converge when \(\{a_{k}\}_{k=1}^\infty\) is decreasing and positive. Since \(S_{n}\) is increasing, because \(\{a_{k}\}_{k=1}^\infty\) is positive, there are 2 possibilities:

  1. \(S_{n}\) converges if it is bounded.
  2. \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } S_{n} = +\infty\) if it is not.

Consider \(S_{2^{n}} = a_{1} + a_{2} + a_{4} + \dots + a_{2^{n}}\). We know that, being increasing, \(S_{n}\) converges if and only if \(S_{2^{n}}\) converges. Now, note that

\[\begin{aligned} S_{2^{n}} &= a_{1}+a_{2}+\dots+a_{2^{n}} \\ &= (a_{1}+a_{2}) + (a_{3} + a_{4}) + (a_{3} + \dots+a_{8}) + \dots+(a_{2^{n-1}+1} + \dots + a_{2^{n}}), \end{aligned}\]

so that, by the expansion above, we have that

\[\begin{aligned} 2a_{2} + 2a_{4}+2^{2} a_{8} + \dots +2^{n-1} a_{2^{n}} &= \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k=2}^{n} 2^{k} a_{2^{k}} + 2a_{2} \\ &\leq S_{2^{n}} \\ & \leq 2a_{1} + 2a_{3} + 2^{2} a_{5} + \dots +2^{n-1} a_{2^{n-1}+ 1} \\ &\leq 2a_{1} + 2a_{2} + 2^{2} a_{4} + \dots + 2^{n-1} a_{2^{n-1}} \\ &= 2a_{1} + \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} 2^{k} a_{2^{k}}. \end{aligned}\]

This test is useful for handling logarithms inside series.

Example

Consider \(\sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n(\ln n)^{2}}\). Take \(\sum_{n=2}^\infty 2^{n} \left(\frac{1}{2^{n}} \frac{1}{(\ln2^{n})^{2}} \right) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(n\ln 2)^{2}} = \frac{1}{(\ln 2)^{2}} \sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{n^{2}}\), which converges by the p-series test.

Theorem (Absolute convergence and permutations)

Let \(\{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^\infty\) be such that \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert a_{n} \rvert\) converges and let \(\phi: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}\). Then \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{\phi(n)}\) converges and moreover \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{\phi(n)} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{n}\).

Proof: Define \(S_{k} =\sum_{n=0}^{k} a_{n}\) , \(\tilde{S_{k}} = \sum_{n=0}^{k} \lvert a_{n} \rvert\) and \(u_{k} = \sum_{n=0}^{k}. a_{\phi(n)}\). We know that \(\sum_{n=0}^\infty \lvert a_{n} \rvert\) converges, i.e., being Cauchy we have that, given \(\varepsilon > 0\), there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for all \(n,m\geq N\)

\[\lvert \tilde{S_{n}} - \tilde{S_{m}} \rvert < \varepsilon.\]

Then \(\lvert a_{n+1} \rvert + \lvert a_{n+2} \rvert + \dots + \lvert a_{m} \rvert < \varepsilon\) Let \(\ell = \lim_{ n \to \infty } S_{n}\). Now take \(N_{1}\) such that \(\lvert S_{k} - \ell \rvert < \varepsilon\) TO BE COMPLETED.

Worked example 1

Consider the series \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{\sqrt{ n(n+1) }}\). Note that \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{ n(n+1) }} \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{ n \cdot n }} = \frac{1}{n}\). Since

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{\frac{1}{\sqrt{ n(n+1) }}}{\frac{1}{n}} = 1\]

and \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n}\) diverges, the given series diverges.

Worked example 2

Consider the series \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \sin\left( \frac{1}{n^{p}} \right)\) for \(p>1\). Note that \(0 \leq \sin(x) \leq x\) for every \(x\geq 0\). Since \(0 \leq \frac{1}{n^{p}}\), we have that \(0\leq \sin\left( \frac{1}{n^{p}} \right) \leq \frac{1}{n^{p}}\). Therefore the series converges by comparison.

Worked example 3

Consider the series \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n^{n}}{(n+1)^{n+1}}\). Note that

\[\frac{n^{n}}{(n+1)^{n+1}} = \frac{1}{n+1} \frac{1}{\left( 1+\frac{1}{n} \right)^{n}} \approx \frac{1}{n+1}\]

Now, \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } (1+\frac{1}{n})^{n} = e\). Hence

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{\frac{n^{n}}{(n+1)^{n+1}}}{\frac{1}{n+1}} = e\]

so the given series diverges.

Worked example 4

Consider the series \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\sqrt{ n } - \sqrt{ n+1 }}{\sqrt{ n(n+1) }} = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{\sqrt{ n+1 }} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{ n }}\). This series converges because it is telescoping and \(\lim_{ n \to \infty } \frac{1}{\sqrt{ n }} = 0\). In particular, the series converges to \(-1\).

Worked example 5

Compute the following limit:

\[\lim_{ n \to \infty } n\left( 1-\left( 1-\frac{1}{2n} \right)^{p} \right).\]